The Impact of Foreign Ownership and the Moderating Role of Ownership Concentration on the Financial Performance of Listed Non-Financial Firms in Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62486/agma2025347Keywords:
Foreign ownership, Ownership concentration, Financial performance, Corporate governance, VietnamAbstract
Amidst conflicting empirical evidence on the impact of foreign ownership in emerging markets, stemming from the dichotomy between the active monitoring role posited by agency theory and concerns over information asymmetry, clarifying this relationship becomes particular pressing in Vietnam, a market characterized by high ownership concentration. This study aims to comprehensively examine (i) the direct effect, (ii) the nonlinear relationship of foreign ownership, and (iii) the moderating role of ownership concentration on firm financial performance. Using an unbalanced panel dataset of 485 non-financial listed firms over the period 2015-2024 (4125 firm-year observations), with financial performance measured by Tobin’s Q and ROA, the study employs the Fixed Effects Model (FEM), complemented by robust estimation methods such as the System Generalized Method of Moments (System GMM) to address endogeneity concerns. The results yield three core findings: (i) foreign ownership has a positive and statistical significant impact on financial performance, supporting the monitoring role of foreign investors; (ii) ownership concentration plays a negative moderating role, significantly weakening this positive relationship, suggesting that the power of large shareholders can impede the benefits derived from foreign investors; and (iii) an inverted U-shaped nonlinear relationship is identified, with an optimal foreign ownership threshold between 25-28 %, beyond which marginal benefits begin to diminish. The study concludes that the benefits of foreign ownership are not absolute but are constrained by the internal governance context and that an optimal point exists.
References
Alfaro L, Chanda A, Kalemli-Ozcan S, Sayek S. FDI and economic growth: the role of local financial markets. J Int Econ. 2004;64(1):89-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00081-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00081-3
Meng Y, Xiong L, Xiao L, Bai M. The effect of overseas investors on local market efficiency: evidence from the shanghai/shenzhen–hong kong stock connect. Financ Innov. 2023;9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00429-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00429-3
Fu R, Gao F, Zhao Y. The capital market consequences of stock market liberalisation: evidence from mainland-hong kong stock connect programs in china. Account Finance. 2024;64(4):3275-3299. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13251 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13251
Jensen MC, Meckling WH. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ. 1976;3(4):305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Aggarwal R, Erel I, Ferreira M, Matos P. Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors. J Financ Econ. 2011;100(1):154-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.018
Shleifer A, Vishny RW. A survey of corporate governance. J Finance. 1997;52(2):737-783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
Liu Y, Wang S, Chen L. The impact of institutional investors' shareholding on the efficiency of corporate investment. Adv Econ Manag Res. 2023;6(1):177. https://doi.org/10.56028/aemr.6.1.177.2023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56028/aemr.6.1.177.2023
Kim E, Kim S, Lee J. Do foreign investors affect carbon emission disclosure? evidence from south korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(19):10097. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910097
Gu X, An Z, Chen C, Li D. Do foreign institutional investors monitor opportunistic managerial behaviour? evidence from real earnings management. Account Finance. 2022;63(1):317-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13015
Douma S, George R, Kabir R. Foreign and domestic ownership, business groups, and firm performance: evidence from a large emerging market. Strateg Manag J. 2006;27(7):637-657. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.535 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.535
Hieu P, Anh H. Ownership of foreign investors and earnings manipulation in vietnamese listed firms. Int J Asian Bus Inf Manag. 2025;16(1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijabim.386164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJABIM.386164
La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A. Corporate ownership around the world. J Finance. 1999;54(2):471-517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
Claessens S, Djankov S, Lang LHP. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. J Financ Econ. 2000;58(1-2):81-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00067-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00067-2
Hung PH. The applicability of lean accounting in enterprises: the case of pulp and paper manufacturing enterprises in Vietnam. Multidiscip Rev. 2025;8(4):2025121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025121
Pomerleano M. The East Asia crisis and corporate finances: the untold micro story. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank; 1998. Report No.: 1990. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/627441468765243403/the-east-asia-crisis-and-corporate-finances-the-untold-micro-story DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-1990
Tukey JW. The future of data analysis. Ann Math Stat. 1962;33(1):1-67. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177704711 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177704711
Chung KH, Pruitt SW. A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financ Manage. 1994;23(3):70-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3838603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3665623
Demsetz H, Lehn K. The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences. J Polit Econ. 1985;93(6):1155-1177. https://doi.org/10.1086/261354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261354
Fama EF, French KR. The cross-section of expected stock returns. J Finance. 1992;47(2):427-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x
Rajan RG, Zingales L. What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. J Finance. 1995;50(5):1421-1460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05184.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05184.x
Pindado J, Requejo I. Family business performance from a governance perspective: a review of empirical work. Int J Manag Rev. 2015;17:279-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12040
Lee PM, O'neill HM. Ownership structures and R&D investments of US and Japanese firms: agency and stewardship perspectives. Acad Manag J. 2003;46(2):212-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30040615
Driscoll JC, Kraay AC. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev Econ Stat. 1998;80(4):549-560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
Arellano M, Bover O. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econom. 1995;68(1):29-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
Blundell R, Bond S. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom. 1998;87(1):115-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Huy Oanh Nguyen (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
