The Impact of Green Governance and the Moderating Role of Institutional Ownership on Financial Reporting Quality in VN-Allshare Listed Companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62486/agma2025337Keywords:
Green Governance, Financial Reporting Quality, Institutional Ownership, Earnings Management, Discretionary Accruals, VN-AllshareAbstract
This study aims to examine the impact of green governance on financial reporting quality, and more importantly, we investigate the moderating role of institutional ownership in this relationship among companies listed in the VN-Allshare index. By analyzing panel data of 346 non-financial companies from 2017 to 2024 through Fixed Effects Model regression, Driscoll-Kraay robust standard errors, and the System GMM method. The results show that green governance has no significant direct impact on financial reporting quality. Meanwhile, the study finds that institutional ownership plays a positive moderating role, enhancing the positive impact of green governance on financial reporting quality. However, this effect is only pronounced for substantive green governance mechanisms (linking executive compensation to environmental performance, having environmental experts on the board) rather than for symbolic mechanisms (establishing a committee). These findings imply that for green governance to be truly effective, merely adopting superficial structures is insufficient; it requires proactive monitoring from institutional shareholders to transform commitments into substantive transparency. The novelty of this research lies in it being one of the pioneering analyses in Vietnam on the conditional relationship of green governance, providing empirical evidence of the "catalyst" role of institutional investors and, for the first time, clearly distinguishing the impact between "symbolic" and "substantive" governance mechanisms.
References
Bebbington J, Larrinaga C. Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2014;39(6):395–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.01.003
Vo XV, Bui HT. Liquidity, liquidity risk and stock returns: evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance. 2016;9(1):67-89. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMEF.2016.074586 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMEF.2016.074586
Amel-Zadeh A, Serafeim G. Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal. 2018;74(3):87–103. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2
Marquis C, Toffel MW. When do firms greenwash? Corporate visibility, civil society scrutiny, and environmental disclosure. Academy of Management Journal. 2012. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0498
Zhang X, Zhao Q, Li W, Wang Y. Top management teams' foreign experience, environmental regulation, and firms' green innovation. Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility. 2023;32(2):819-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12526 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12526
Chen X, Chen X, Fang M, Xia W, Hu Y. The impact of the top management team faultlines on environment, social and governance performance of listed companies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 2023;29(6):1776-806. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2023.19547 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2023.19547
Walls JL, Berrone P, Phan PH. Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal. 2012;33(8):885–913. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1952 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1952
Ooi L, Teh S, Cheang P. The impact of lean production on sustainable organizational performance: the moderating effect of industry 4.0 technologies adoption. Management Research Review. 2023;46(12):1802-36. https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-06-2022-0448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2022-0448
Healy PM, Wahlen JM. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons. 1999;13(4):365–83. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.365
Dechow PM, Sloan RG, Sweeney AP. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review. 1995;70(2):193–225. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248303
Gillan SL, Starks LT. The evolution of shareholder activism in the United States. In: Us corporate governance. Columbia University Press; 2009. p. 202-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/chew14856-011
Chung R, Firth M, Kim JB. Institutional monitoring and opportunistic earnings management. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2002;8(1):29–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00039-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00039-6
Jensen MC, Meckling WH. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 1976;3(4):305-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Freeman RE. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman; 1984.
Jo H, Harjoto MA. Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. 2011;103(3):351-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0866-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0869-y
Shleifer A, Vishny RW. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy. 1986;94(3):461-88. https://doi.org/10.1086/261385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261385
Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC, Parmar BL, De Colle S. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815768
Nguyen TV. Sustainable Finance: The Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Contractual Bargain: Case Study of Vietnamese Law. In: Green Economic Development and Transition to Low-Carbon Economy in the East and Southeast Asia. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2025. p. 109-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0628-3_7
Al-Shaer H, Zaman M. Board gender diversity and sustainability reporting quality. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics. 2016;12(3):210-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2016.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2016.09.001
Dhaliwal DS, Li OZ, Tsang A, Yang YG. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review. 2011;86(1):59-100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005
Gerged AM, Matthews L, Elheddad M. Mandatory disclosure, greenhouse gas emissions and the cost of equity capital: UK evidence of a U-shaped relationship. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2021;30(2):908-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2661
Pizzi S, Principale S, Fasiello R, Imperiale F. The institutionalisation of social and environmental accounting practices in Europe. Journal of Applied Accounting Research. 2023;24(5):816-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-07-2022-0190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-07-2022-0190
Ebaid IES. Nexus between sustainability reporting and corporate financial performance: evidence from an emerging market. International Journal of Law and Management. 2023;65(2):152-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2022-0073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2022-0073
Boone AL, White JT. The effect of institutional ownership on firm transparency and information production. Journal of Financial Economics. 2015;117(3):508-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.05.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.05.008
Chen X, Harford J, Li K. Monitoring: Which institutions matter?. Journal of Financial Economics. 2007;86(2):279-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.09.005
Dyck A, Lins KV, Roth L, Wagner HF. Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics. 2019;131(3):693-714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013
Eliwa Y, Haslam J, Abraham S, Saleh A. The power of oversight: institutional investors as moderators of the earnings quality-information asymmetry nexus in europe. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management. 2025;33(1):68-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-01-2024-0029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-01-2024-0029
Vo XV. Foreign ownership and corporate cash holdings in emerging markets. International Review of Finance. 2018;18(2):297-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12130
Pham HTT, Jung SC, Lee SY. Governmental ownership of voluntary sustainability information disclosure in an emerging economy: Evidence from Vietnam. Sustainability. 2020;12(16):6686. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166686 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166686
Kothari SP, Leone AJ, Wasley CE. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2005;39(1):163-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002
Watts RL, Zimmerman JL. Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice-Hall; 1986.
Klein A. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2002;33(3):375-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00059-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00059-9
Clarke M, Seng D, Whiting RH. Intellectual capital and firm performance in Australia. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2011;12(4):505–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931111181706 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931111181706
Collins DW, Kothari SP. An analysis of intertemporal and cross-sectional determinants of earnings response coefficients. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 1989;11(2-3):143-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(89)90004-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(89)90004-9
Driscoll JC, Kraay AC. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics. 1998;80(4):549-60. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
Arellano M, Bover O. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics. 1995;68(1):29-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
Blundell R, Bond S. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics. 1998;87(1):115-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
Nivetha P, Prasanth S. Beyond the hype: uncovering the real impact of corporate greenwashing on sustainability. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities. 2024;11(S3-Feb):30-4. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v11iS3-Feb.7238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v11iS3-Feb.7238
Ibrahim F. Reforming corporate accounting through sustainable finance: insights on green bonds, esg disclosure, and circular economy integration. IJAT. 2024;2(3):37-49. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijat.v2i3.649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61194/ijat.v2i3.649
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Thanh Thuy Pham, Huy Hung Pham (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
