Assessment and Analysis of Public Policy Impact: Contemporary Approaches and Future Application Opportunities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62486/agma2025254Keywords:
monitoring of state programmes, management efficiency, efficiency index, return on investment, digitalisation, adaptive management, cloud technologiesAbstract
Introduction: The article examines the methods of monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of government programmes actively implemented in different regions to address modern socio-economic and environmental challenges. The topic’s relevance is driven by the need to increase the transparency of public administration and the efficiency of public resources globally.
Objectives: The study’s objectives included an assessment of the IEP programme effectiveness index and ROI, comparing the achieved and projected results by key indicators, and studying the prospects for introducing digital technologies into monitoring processes.
Methods:The study was based on the methods of comparative analysis and calculations of the programme effectiveness index (IEP) and return on investment (ROI). Their application allowed us to analyse the effectiveness of programmes of various scales using key social, economic, and environmental indicators.
Results: It was found that local initiatives with a narrow focus demonstrate a significantly higher efficiency IEP = 0.400 due to the rational use of limited resources. Instead, large-scale programmes ensure long-term systemic changes, but their efficiency index remains relatively low IEP = 0.00027 due to long implementation periods and multidirectional tasks. The article emphasises the importance of integrating digital technologies, in particular, automating monitoring processes and using artificial intelligence to analyse large amounts of data, which can improve the accuracy of evaluation and adaptability of government programme management.
Conclusions: The article outlines the need to introduce adaptive monitoring mechanisms that allow for the efficient management of government programmes and for achieving goals in the dynamic conditions of the modern world. Prospects for research include the development of new approaches to the evaluation of long-term programmes, taking into account the latest technological trends, and the integration of cloud platforms for transparent management and monitoring.
References
Machuca-Vílchez JA, Ramos-Cavero MJ, Cordova-Buiza F. Knowledge management in financial education in Peruvian government programmes focused on women: Progress and challenges. Knowledge and Performance Management 2023;7(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.07(1).2023.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.07(1).2023.01
Kupiainen P, Komulainen K, Eriksson P, Räty H. Is older entrepreneurship being silenced? A policy analysis of Finnish government programmes. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 2023;35(9-10):746–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2023.2225035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2023.2225035
Taylor JK. Artists, government and cross-sector collaboration: A guiding framework of US-based artists in residence in government programmes. Cultural Trends 2023;32(5):513–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2022.2083944 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2022.2083944
Hoshi T, Kawaguchi D, Ueda K. Zombies, again? The COVID-19 business support programmes in Japan. Journal of Banking and Finance 2023;147:106421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106421
Tutuk V, Nazarkina V, Babenko M, Nemchenko A, Zhakipbekov K. Assessment of medical technologies in the formation of government programmes to assist patients with rare metabolic diseases. ScienceRise: Pharmaceutical Science 2023;2023(5):99–108. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4852.2023.290218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4852.2023.290218
Mehta BS, Alambusha R, Misra A, Mehta N, Madan A. Assessment of utilisation of government programmes and services by pregnant women in India. PLoS ONE 2023;18(10):e0285715. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285715
Baco IV. Comprehensive government programmes for indigenous peoples in the Philippines. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences 2023;10(6):89–99. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.06.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.06.011
Salamah S, Khafiyya AN, Ramadhani R, Arfiana MR, Syamsuri I, Faizah NN, ... Alkaff FF. Outcomes of the Indonesian Chronic Disease Management Programme (PROLANIS) in Patients with Hypertension During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Rural Areas: A Preliminary Evaluation Study. Medical Science Monitor 2023a;29:e939797. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.939797 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.939797
Mohammadzadeh Y, Sheikhmali A, Yahyavi Dizaj J, Mosadeghrad AM, Yusefzadeh H, Refah Kahriz A. The impact of government subsidy programmes on equity in health financing. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2023;21:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00460-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00460-w
Abdallah I, Carree T, Dakutis P, Shu F, Oraka E. The Role of Government-Funded Assistance Programmes on HIV Testing Among Poor U.S. Adults. Health Education and Behaviour 2023;50(1):18–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981211045925 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981211045925
Cruda KA, V., Dellomes NC, Matao JA, Cubillo JB. Assessing Crime Prevention through Government Programmes. Journal of Legal Subjects 2023;32:23–26. https://doi.org/10.55529/jls.32.23.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jls.32.23.26
Bueno N, Nunes F, Zucco C. Benefits by Luck: A Study of Lotteries as a Selection Method for Government Programmes. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4411082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4411082
Alekseieva K, Maletych M, Ptashchenko O, Baranova O, Buryk Z. 2023; State business support programs in wartime conditions. Economic Affairs (New Delhi) 2023;68(1):231–242. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1s.2023.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1s.2023.26
Bondarenko S, Bratko A, Antonov V, Kolisnichenko R, Hubanov O, Mysyk A. Improving the State system of strategic planning of national security in the context of informatization of society. Journal of Information Technology Management 2022;14:1–24. https://doi.org/10.22059/jitm.2022.88861
Byrkovych T, Denysiuk Z, Gaievska L, Akimova L, Prokopenko L, Akimov O. State policy of cultural and art projects funding as a factor in the stability of state development in the conditions of globalization. Economic Affairs (New Delhi) 2023;68(1):199–211. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1s.2023.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1s.2023.23
Miller SM, Song M, Keiser LR. The effect of human versus automated interaction on willingness to participate in government programmes: The role of representation. Public Administration 2023;101(4):1349–1366. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12879
Suriyanti S, Tanjung M. Village Government Programmes in Developing Qur’an Reading in Bulungihit Village, Marbau Sub-district. Jurnal Pamator: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo 2023;16(3):549–563. https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v16i3.21657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v16i3.21657
Parvin MT, Birner R, Nahar A. How well does government microcredit serve the investment needs of small and medium enterprises? An impact analysis on handloom weavers in Bangladesh. South Asian Journal of Business Studies 2023;12(2):242–268. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-07-2020-0260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-07-2020-0260
Kant S. Meta Analysis of Marketing Innovation on Firm’s Performance of Small Medium Enterprises with the Moderating effect of Government Support Programme: In case of Selected Sub-Cities of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. OPSearch: American Journal of Open Research 2023;2(2):152–164. https://doi.org/10.58811/opsearch.v2i2.41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58811/opsearch.v2i2.41
Barati M. Open Government Data Programmes and Information Privacy Concerns: A Literature Review. EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government 2023;15(1):73–123. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v15i1.759 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v15i1.759
de Lima HSB, Sodré VRD, Souza CAA, Cardoso MD, Gonçalves CCM, Nogueira LMV, ... Maciel ELN. Access of people with pulmonary tuberculosis to government programmes: Primary Care professionals’ perceptions. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem 2023;76(Suppl 2). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0716
Scheidt E. Socialism and democracy in the government programmes of Salvador Allende and Hugo Chávez. Estudos Ibero-Americanos 2023;49(1):e42418. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-864X.2023.1.42418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-864X.2023.1.42418
Kumar S, Singh P. An Analysis of Government Support Programmes for Small Business Development and Growth. Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy Governance 2023;10(2):8. https://doi.org/10.19085/sijbpg100201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19085/sijbpg100201
World Bank. GlobalGovernanceProgramme. [Internet]. 2024 [cited 29 May 2025]; Available in: https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/bc4d7580e7ed8bb430153cea939663cb-0060052021/original/ggp-program-doc-v4.pdf
OECD. Open Government for Stronger Democracies: A Global Assessment. OECD Publishing, Paris, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1787/5478db5b-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5478db5b-en
Al Shukaili AM, Al Kindi K, Kassim NM, Ahmed Z, Al Hosni K. Can government financial support enhance job creations: insights from Oman. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management 2023;14(5):807–829. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-07-2021-0100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-07-2021-0100
Hedley D, Hedley DFE, Walkowiak E, Bury SM, Spoor JR, Shiell A. Cost-benefit analysis of a non-governmental organisation and Australian government collaborative supported employment programme for autistic people. Autism 2023;27(5):1377–1390. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221138643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221138643
Najafabadi MM, Cronemberger FA. Systemic effects of an open government programme on data quality: the case of New York State’s Food Protection programme area. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 2023;17(2):192–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2021-0194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2021-0194
Salamah S, Ramadhani R, Arfiana MR, Syamsuri I, Nugraha D, Illavi F, ... Alkaff FF. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the outcomes of Indonesian chronic disease management programme. Electronic Journal of General Medicine 2023b;20(6):em541. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/13661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/13661
Fleta-Asín J, Muñoz F. When bigger is better: Investment volume drivers in infrastructure public-private partnership projects. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 2023;86:101473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101473
Giorcelli M. Closing the productivity gap with the US: Causes and consequences of the productivity programme in Western Europe. Manchester School 2024;92(4):426–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12473
Daradar MB, Atutubo VP. E-government Programme Implementation in Public Elementary Schools in Sorsogon, Philippines. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif 2023;13(2):669–681. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v13.i2.202340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v13.i2.202340
Roifatul Lailin U, Reta Kusumawijayanti A, Dyan Nofa Harumike Y, Lailatus Saadah D. Use of Instagram Social Media as Blitar City Government Branding Programme (Rt Keren Case Study Programme, Bendogerit Village). International Journal of Science, Technology Management 2023;4(6):1713–1717. https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v4i6.1012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v4i6.1012
Finlay B, Wittevrongel K, Materula D, Hébert ML, O’Grady K, Lach LM, ... Zwicker JD. Pan-Canadian caregiver experiences in accessing government disability programmes: A mixed methods study. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2023;134:104420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104420
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nataliia Stativka, Alla Nadtochii, Tetiana Hordieieva, Nina Petrukha, Andrii Telendii (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
