The importance of sustainability in agro-industrial companies: A comprehensive approach for the future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62486/agma2025202Keywords:
Sustainability, Indicators, Impacts, ManagementAbstract
Sustainability has become a fundamental pillar for agricultural companies due to the growing demand for responsible practices that integrate economic, social, environmental, and institutional aspects. This study explored the implementation of a sustainability matrix in a company dedicated to the production and marketing of chickens and eggs, activities that represent a significant part of the agricultural sector in Argentina.
The objective is to implement a unified sustainability measurement system based on Wehbe et al.(1) Sustainability Matrix, to optimize the company's overall performance, considering not only financial aspects but also its social and environmental impact.
An analysis of production processes and profitability and sustainability strategies for the year 2024 was conducted. Key performance indicators (KPIs) aligned with the four dimensions of sustainability: economic, social, environmental, and institutional were identified. Based on these KPIs, a composite sustainability indicator was calculated to assess the company's overall performance. Finally, an annual action plan was designed to correct the detected deviations and promote continuous improvement.
The results show an improvement in the strategic diagnostic capacity thanks to the integration of multidimensional indicators.
It is concluded that the implementation of the Sustainability Matrix as a management tool allowed the company to move toward a comprehensive performance view. The systematization of indicators facilitated strategic decision-making, improving profitability and social and environmental impact. The proposed approach provides a solid foundation for the continuity and competitiveness of the agricultural business in an increasingly demanding environment in terms of corporate responsibility.
References
Wehbe MB, Tonolli A, Vianco AM, Baronio AM, Seiler RA, Mendoza AJ. Una metodología para la evaluación de la sustentabilidad de sistemas productivos primarios. En: V Congreso Latinoamericano de Agroecología-SOCLA; 2015; La Plata. La Plata: SOCLA; 2015.
Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1996.
Doran GT. There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives. Manage Rev. 1981;70:35-6.
Mendoza LA. Sustentabilidad económica, social y ambiental en el marco de una matriz de contabilidad social híbrida para el estado de Yucatán, México [tesis doctoral]. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla; 2015.
Espinoza Fuentes CA. Estudio de factibilidad técnica económica de una propuesta de mejora para la reutilización de residuos sólidos que genera la actividad de la empresa Avícola Real SA [tesis]. 2014.
Pérez SMP, Flores HM. Herramienta electrónica como instrumento para la cuantificación de los costos socioambientales bajo la nueva normativa contable y financiera en una empresa del sector industrial–avícola–en Bucaramanga, caso práctico. Rev Colomb Contab-ASFACOP. 2020;8(16):151-69.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. New York: United Nations; 1987.
Hernández-Sampieri R, Mendoza C. Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. México: McGraw-Hill; 2020.
Seiler R, Vianco A. Metodología para generar indicadores de sustentabilidad de sistemas productivos. Río Cuarto: Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto; 2017.
Wehbe MB, Mendoza AM, Seiler RA, Vianco AM, Baronio AM, Tonolli AJ, Inter C. Evaluación de la sustentabilidad de sistemas productivos locales: una propuesta basada en la participación colaborativa y en la resiliencia de los sistemas socio-ecológicos. Glob Sustain Dev Rep. 2015;1-7.
Gutierrez Suarez, I. D., & Franco Rincón, M. L. (2024). Tecnologías sostenibles en la producción cafetera para la gestión eficiente del agua en el departamento del Tolima (Bachelor's thesis, Maestría en Gerencia de Proyectos-Virtual).
Rodríguez Güiza, M. P. (2013). Estimación de las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero (GEI) en sistemas de producción porcina confinada en Colombia y alternativas de mitigación.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.
Baumann, H., & Tillman, A. M. (2004). The Hitch Hiker's Guide to LCA: An Orientation in Life Cycle Assessment Methodology and Application. Studentlitteratur.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Silvana Andrea Sattler, Mariano Romero, Alfredo Baronio Autor (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
