Equality of weapons in disciplinary law, within the framework of the general disciplinary code and workplace harassment Colombia 2022 - 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62486/agma202422Keywords:
Process, law, disciplinary, harassment, laborAbstract
In the public sphere, Law 1010 of 2006, defined and established as punishable behaviors by way of very serious misdemeanor, any insult to human dignity attributable to public servants involved in labor relations, considering the need to protect, among others, the harmony and a good work environment, which depend on the actions or omissions of workers or employees of state organizations.
Now, with the entry into force of the General Process Code, the intervention of a subject within the additional sanctioning process was allowed to the parties that are already recognized in the current procedural law, such as the recognition of the victims in line with what provided in article 109 of Law 1562 of 2019, thus imposing an inequality of subjects and a violation of due process for those investigated, so there should be no more participants in the disciplinary process other than the operator and the subject subject to discipline, under penalty to distort disciplinary law
References
Cruz Patiño, Fernando (2007). “Derecho disciplinario práctico” Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia.
Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Informe N° 25/03. Petición 289/2002 Caso Santo Domingo contra Colombia 6 de marzo de 2003.
Consejo de Estado, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo. Sección Tercera - Subsección B. (2018). Radicación número: 73001-23-31-000-2008-00100-01(40496).
Corte Constitucional Sentencia C-430 de 1997.
Corte Constitucional, sentencia C-013 de 2001.
Corte Constitucional, Sentencia C-014, 2004.
Corte Constitucional, Sentencia T-473, 2017
Corte Constitucional, Sentencia C-029, 2021
Corte Constitucional, Sentencia SU-371, 2021
Moratto, S. 2021. El principio de igualdad de armas: un análisis conceptual. derecho Penal y Criminología. 41, 110 (may 2021), 177–202. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18601/01210483.v41n110.08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18601/01210483.v41n110.08
Procuraduría Auxiliar para Asuntos Disciplinarios. Concepto C-125-2006 del 20 de abril de 2006. Consulta formula por la Secretaria General de la Dirección de Tránsito de Bucaramanga.
Procurador General de la Nación. Radicación: 119-04 SIAF 185720 (V-222/05). Trámite: Providencia del 19 de abril de 2006, por la cual se revoca directamente un fallo sancionatorio.
Sánchez Berrera, E. M. (2007). “La estructura del proceso disciplinario. Procedimiento ordinario. Lecciones de Derecho Disciplinario”. Vol. 5. Instituto de Estudios del Ministerio Público. Instituto Nacional de Derecho Disciplinario.
Vargas Reyes, R. Y. (2022). Las victimas en el proceso disciplinario. Blog Opiniones Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Procesal. En: https://icdp.org.co/las-victimas-en-el-proceso-disciplinario/
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Isabel Cristina Lezama Velásquez, Ana Valeria Restrepo Salazar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
