Operation of the organizational structure of the university of carabobo as a venezuelan autonomous institution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62486/agma2025129Keywords:
University of Carabobo, Organizational Structure, Autonomy, FunctioningAbstract
Introduction: The University of Carabobo is an autonomous educational institution that has a defined organizational structure for its operation, which consists of different instances and governing bodies that work in a coordinated manner to make decisions and carry out the academic and administrative activities of the university. institution. In this organization, at the top of the structure is the University Council, the highest governing body of the university, which is made up of the Rector, who is the main representative of the institution, and other members such as the Vice-rectors, deans and student representatives. Thus, the University Council has the authority to establish policies and regulations, make important decisions and supervise the general functioning of the university. Under this University Council are the different Faculties and Schools that make up the university. Each of them is headed by a Dean and directors, who are responsible for the academic and administrative management of their respective unit. Likewise, the University of Carabobo has a series of support and advisory bodies in different areas, such as the Scientific and Humanistic Development Council, in charge of promoting and supporting scientific research and development; the Planning and Budget Directorate, responsible for strategic planning and resource allocation; and the Office of Interinstitutional Relations, in charge of coordinating programs and agreements with other institutions.
Method: a documentary review was carried out.
Conclusion: the organizational structure of the University of Carabobo is based on the University Council as the main governing body, the Faculties and Schools as academic units, and various support and advisory bodies. These elements work together to ensure the efficient and autonomous functioning of the university.
References
. LópezF MT. La cultura organizativa como herramienta de gestión interna y de adaptación al entorno. Un estudio de casos múltiples en empresas murcianas. Universidad de Murcia. 2013. https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/117203/TESIS.pdf?sequence=
SandovalE LY. El ser y el hacer de la organización educativa. Revista Educación y Educadores. 2006, 9(1). http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-12942006000100003#:~:text=La%20organizaci%C3%B3n%20educativa%20es%20el,a%20trav%C3%A9s%20de%20la%20ense%C3%B1anza.
Marcano JJ. Análisis crítico de la gerencia y transformación en la educación universitaria, desde diversos postulados. Revista Scientific. 2017, 2(E), 275-294. https://www.doi.org/10.29394/scientific.issn.2542-2987.2017.0.0.15.275-294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29394/scientific.issn.2542-2987.2017.0.0.15.275-294
Congreso Nacional de Venezuela. Ley de Universidades. Gaceta Oficial de la República de Venezuela, 1.429, Extraordinario, de 8 de septiembre de 1970. http://www.ucv.ve/fileadmin/user_upload/comision_electoral/Normativa_legal/index.htm
Albornoz O. La universidad ¿reforma o experimento? El discurso académico contemporáneo según las perspectivas de los organismos internacionales: Los aprendizajes para la universidad venezolana y latinoamericana. UNESCO-IESALC. 2013. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000221731
Bernate J y Vargas J. Desafíos y tendencias del siglo XXI en la educación superior. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve). 2020, XXVI(E-2), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v26i0.34119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v26i0.34119
Bokova I. Un nuevo humanismo para el siglo XXI. UNESCO. 2010. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000189775_spa
García-Guadilla C. Universidad, desarrollo y cooperación en la perspectiva de América Latina. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior. 2013, 4(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-2872(13)71914-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2013.9.81
Marcano J. Análisis crítico de la gerencia y transformación en la educación universitaria, desde diversos postulados. Revista Scientific. 2017, 2(E), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.29394/scientific.issn.2542-2987.2017.0.0.15.275-294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29394/scientific.issn.2542-2987.2017.0.0.15.275-294
Marín F. Resignificar la praxis educativa en tiempos de incertidumbre: un desafío para las organizaciones sociales. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve). 2020, XXVI(E-2), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v26i0.34140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v26i0.34140
Pérez G y Moreno Z. Constructo teórico sobre gerencia universitaria. Criterio Libre. 2017, 15(26), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-0642/criteriolibre.2017v15n26.1030 11. Rama C. La universidad como organización. Universidad San Andrés, Argentina. 2008. https://es.slideshare.net/claudiorama/la-universidad-como-organizacion?next_slideshow=1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-0642/criteriolibre.2017v15n26.1030
Torcatt T. Liderazgo gerencial y desempeño laboral en docentes del estado Nueva Esparta, Venezuela. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve). 2020, XXVI(E-2), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v26i0.34112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v26i0.34112
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Johnny José Sifontes , José Álvarez (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.